If you’re wondering what to do about depression or what to do about anxiety, psychotherapy may have come to mind. It’s a natural, right? So why is its use in a tailspin? And should you be concerned?
Before we dig-in, I want to emphasize I’m a practicing psychotherapist. That either means I’m making a huge mistake by writing about my bread and butter spiraling downward, or I believe the facts need to be analyzed and vulnerabilities addressed. Given I have my client’s and reader’s best interests at heart, I’m opting for the latter.
Alrighty, then – let’s take a peek and see what’s going on here…
What to Do About Depression? | What to Do About Anxiety? | Psychotherapy Treatment In a Tailspin
In a special issue of Clinical Psychology Review, Brown University professors of psychiatry and human behavior Brandon Gaudiano, PhD and Ivan Miller, PhD sliced-and-diced this fact: the use of psychotherapy has “tailspinned” in the United States – in spite of strong evidence it works.
So what’s the deal here, anyway?
According to Gaudiano and Miller, issues exist within and outside the profession. They submit the psychotherapy community hasn’t defined, embraced, and spread the word regarding exactly what it does. Nor has it made its case pertaining to adherence to evidence-based practice. And that leads us to the “outside” problem. Pharmaceutical companies (Big Pharma) – and their co-conspirators – have.
Let’s chat evidence-based practice for a moment. The skinny: As it applies here, be it a medical or psych issue, all practical treatment decisions should be grounded in research studies, and these studies need to be selected and interpreted according to specific norms. In a perfect world, this would prohibit the theoretical. But since when do we live in a perfect world?
Our current system of medicine and health insurance gives more credence to the biological, rewarding evidence-based practice. And since it’s perceived psychotherapy has no “evidence-base,” it’s lost credibility among physicians, insurers, and policymakers. (All of whom, by the way, would lose big-bucks if they assigned even a smidge of credibility to psychotherapy.)
From Gaudiano and Miller…
One might think that this deep and expanding evidence base would have promoted a similar increase in the use of psychosocial interventions that at least would have paralleled the one witnessed over the recent years by psychotropics, but it decidedly has not. Thus a time that should have been a relative boon for psychotherapy based on scientific standards has become more of a bust.
How in the heck did that happen? Well, Gaudiano and Miller believe the psychotherapy tailspin occurred because clinicians haven’t held themselves to an evidence-based practice standard. Oh, for the record, there are evidence-based psychotherapies. Among them, cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and dialectical behavior therapy.
Gaudiano and Miller state there are studies that show a significant number of psychotherapists place personal experience and intuition ahead of the evidence-based. So, yes, there are therapists out and about who on occasion use, shall we say, a “creative, unsupported” therapy. And according to Gaudiano and Miller, said therapists refuse to support strict standards because they fear they may be forced to change how they treat their clients. I happen to be one of those therapists, and supporting strict standards and being forced to change my clinical approach don’t frighten me in the least.
Now, while all this evidence-based adherence volleyball was being played on the psychotherapy court, a variety of factors outside the field marched onward, placing greater emphasis upon strictly medical and biological approaches to emotional/mental health disorders.
Those factors? Less than effective campaigns to “destigmatize” emotional/mental illness as a “legitimate” physical disease, and lopsided reimbursement for meds vs. psychotherapy grounded in issues of evidence-base. Ever wonder why psychiatrists abandoned therapy, opting for meds-exclusive practices? There you have it. But you can be sure many of these psychiatrists have psychotherapists on staff. Can’t leave any money on the table.
Very sadly, what we’ve discussed has hurt the field of psychotherapy – and those enduring emotional/mental health disorders – in far-reaching ways. For example, federal and private funding for emotional/mental health research, which has traditionally supported the development of effective psychosocial treatments – building an evidence-base – is drying-up. That’s right, the bucks are being thrown at purely medical and biological research.
Well, in spite of Gaudiano’s and Miller’s revelations, all is not lost for psychotherapists. They cite mobile technology as providing a new platform for efficient therapy delivery, as well as the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) offering new avenues for psychotherapists to become part of collaborative health care teams.
Still, Gaudiano and Miller submit psychotherapists must “rally” around evidenced-based practice to secure their future.
So now to you, the user (or potential) of psychotherapy services. What to do about depression? What to do about anxiety? Should you be concerned? How ’bout this? Do not – I repeat – do not abandon psychotherapy as an option. Sure, I’m a provider; however, I’d say the same to a family member or close friend.
Listen, I fully support the use of evidence-based practice. However, in our imperfect world things aren’t always so neatly cut-and-dried. Psychotherapists have no choice but to occasionally lean upon the theoretical – relying upon, say, experience and intuition. Think about it! Until there are lab and radiological tests that can for-sure diagnose emotional/mental illnesses – and medical/pharmacological treatments that can for-sure provide healing – what choice have we? This is not an exact science.
Ah, but you can be sure while the kinks are being ironed-out, Big Pharma and their billions will continue to hold those with emotional/mental health disorders hostage. And insurance companies, with their bottom-line driven “quick-fix” M.O., will continue to co-conspire.
No doubt about it, the psychotherapy tailspin is being forced, selfish and cash-drunk opportunists slashing the tank.
More Chipur articles addressing vital mood and anxiety disorder information are yours for the reading. Take the time, learn, and heal.